Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Nathan's avatar

Madame Pointier,

As a military historian (MA, King's College London, 1985; PhD, Scottish Center for War Studies, 1991) I spend a considerable amount of time in freshmen seminars, at cocktail parties and – though the frequency of invitations I’ve received to them has unaccountably diminished over the years – at tailgate parties correcting common mistakes in the use of the Great War battles as metaphors for conflicts between, say, dormitory alliances regarding shower time limitation agreements, faculty disputes vis a vis parking privileges or the “ground game” in American “football”. You will therefore understand and forgive, I hope, that your subtle but distinct reference (at least for scholars such as myself) to that topsy zigzag plaything of fate – one general Philippe (“the Lion of Verdun”) Petain – awoke in me an instant wariness. You might even say it awoke a suspicion, if you will forgive me, that you might be playing fast and loose with matters of great geopolitical seriousness. It is the solemn duty of a scholar to stand watch over the debasement of history and to correct misstatements of fact and inference wherever and whenever they appear, to provide critical context where it is missing, and when the opportunity presents itself, to add the zest and colour of essential historical facts from the humble compendium of military details I carry everywhere in my head. I accept this responsibility despite the friendships it has soured and the awkwardness of inserting myself into conversations overheard on the trolley because, as you will doubtless again agree, someone must speak up for the dead. It is not easy. I cannot count the number of times that I – a British subject! – have been accused of humourlessness, a charge that, in all earnestness, quite baffles me. Still, I soldier on, an often lonely guardian against the casually mis-applied military metaphor.

But where were we? I seem to have strayed. Ah – Mr. Daytona of the coffee and confectionery shop. Before proposing a modest improvement and several small corrections to your otherwise commendably ambitious use of history by a layperson, may I just write that I noticed how you skillfully avoided choosing between “Mr. Daytona” and “Miss Daytona” in your rather Continental reply to the troubled youth? While the French seem quite comfortable tossing out “Cher Daytona” and “mon Herbert” and even “Votre maîtresse et servant” as if they were shell casings at Iwo Jima we British simply do not speak like this. Without the protection of these blandishments I must poke my head above the parapet, so to speak, and commit to “Mr” or “Miss”. After long consideration I have settled on “Mr. Daytona” because, despite the leaning to the feminine usage “we loved [the installer]” and the evidently flirtatious “It’s your flash bomb” (even men named Herbert don’t usually talk to one another like that) or the less than manly admission that “I was frozen… I was in a horror film” I conclude that “Daybreak in Daytona” is a masculine figure. I rely here on the professorial instinct honed from my long study of correspondence between separated bunkmates serving in Horatio Nelson’s Royal British Navy. At first glance those old letters seem so feminine the perfume practically rises off the page. However the absence of actual women in Her Majesty’s 18th century navy is a matter of near historical certainty. Quod erat demonstrandum: “Daybreak in Daytona” is a “he”. It’s a pity that those in positions of power and influence do not more assiduously consult the true scholars amongst us. Sometimes the truth is the exact opposite of what’s perfectly obvious to everyone else. It takes an advanced degree to see that.

I really must conclude. I have papers to grade. So, Mr. Daytona, here is my military analogy: don’t imagine yourself as some exhausted foot soldier tromping through the mud while Herbert the Installer grins at you like a Cheshire Cat hovering in the trees. Instead, summon up the scene in The Deer Hunter where the prisoner of war is compelled by his captors to shoot a revolver at his own head and about eight jailors are all pointing their rifles at him so there’s no monkey business. That’s more true to the feeling you get when the cashier spins the little screen around to face you. You could put down $0 most of the time and nothing happens – click – click – click – but you’re never sure, are you? That’s why it’s such an exciting game. Anyway, what did the captive do in The Deer Hunter? It’s a Hollywood movie so I don’t actually remember, but the analogy still holds. Basically, don’t pull the trigger. In short, follow Tippi Pointier’s excellent advice and always be ready to tip $0. Her advice is correct but dragging General Petain into the picture just confuses things. Stick with “The Deer Hunter” to really grasp the spirit of the situation and you'll be fine.

Expand full comment
Mr. Troy Ford's avatar

I'm not 1000% sure what Tip's advice ultimately was, but I'm certain it was correct. Have I ever mentioned I took French 1 four times? Part of why I love Tippi so much is that she speaks to me at my level, that quantum continuum between dingdong and mastermind that goes undecided until someone is looking. She is, how do you say? Parfait - a delicious dessert.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts